|
The principles that we can extract from the
simple observation of a living organism, even the less
complex, are critical to understand that our world is based
on rules and logic to standard models. A little 'as in the
theory of elementary particles, the Standard Model (SM) can
be applied to macroworld upsetting perhaps forever even
rational mechanics.
We have been accustomed, especially in recent decades, to
suppose the world according to categories of thought that,
in some ways, it constituted a reality of things a bit 'too
abstract.
Just starting with the Standard Model and supersymmetric
particles (theory in analysis and expanding even
philosophical) we can begin to understand that the
macroscopic world is organized in supersymmetries that the
effect of deterministic mathematical functions (and chaotic
systems), often escape us.
Elude us is not to say, as we increasingly understand that
the world is incomprehensible and just this regard should
lead to philosophical speculation (which is the science of
inducing others) that modern nihilism is more intellectual
son of this period of transition historical and real value.
Now while it is easier (forgive me-renowned scientists and
scholars) investigate supersymmetry, superstring theory, and
links between the particles and fundamental forces of
nature, given the "narrow" the search becomes much more
complex when the variables involved are derived from systems
of representation and multifaceted ecosystems.
Yet, gradually that we hardly ever understanding
dell'ecoworld we find that there is a supersymmetric why,
taking origin from the logic of the basic building blocks
(elementary particles), is structured in a hierarchy
organized complexity (to use the concept of Ilya Prigogine )
until the events (life) for us (sometimes or often - do you)
incomprehensible. This does not mean lack of rules, but the
difficulty of the intellectual content of the whole.
Here we may recall, this structural feature to explain the
thinking of the time, that not understanding is not
synonymous with chaos (or not to use an anagram
deterministic) and to do that we go back to an episode that
a collection of medieval Exempla attaches Agostino Aurelio
(better known as St. Augustine, 354 to 430 AD), which often
appears in its iconography, "as Augustine, walking on a
deserted beach, meditating on the mystery of the Trinity, he
saw a child with a bucket pour l ' seawater into a hole in
the sand. The Holy kindly warned him of the futility of the
effort, but the child, revealed by an angel, explained that
a hole in the sand can hold the sea more easily than the
human mind can contain the mystery of the Trinity. " Without
going into uncomfortable and inappropriate combinations
between theology and science is evident that the
superficiality of some thought today would be contrary to
ensuring that all there is a rule, but if at all there is a
rule to say that the more familiar (or intuition) and more I
can get the standard model (whether micro or macroscopic).
Life (the man in the universe) can become sustainable only
in this state and indeed, if we want to be practical and
philosophically and scientifically realistic, becomes more
conscious of this and more sustainable. A little 'as a
rectangular hyperbola which is moving ever closer to the
axis of abscissas but not touch ever (geometry docet).
The World, with all its functions is symmetrical and based
on a standard, there is no way out (thankfully), and any
attempt to caotizzazione Rules and Life, being not based on
the idea Supersymmetry logic, it is destined to disappear.
Guido Bissanti.
|
