|
|
Rural Reform
A True
Application of the 1996 Cork Declaration
We cannot assist without reacting to the Political,
Scientific and Social indifference that is shown towards the rural
world. The issue is linked to the indifference of the economic
and financial system towards a fabric that cannot have explicit
repercussions on the GDP and on the economic indexes. Moreover
the Rural System, in such, cannot be "stimulated" with superficial
financial policies. A fabric must be connected in structural way,
where Man, Territory and Economy find citizenship and not
subjection. The Rural System involves and connects every Social
and Environmental sphere. Ignoring this by creating alternative and
unscrupulous policies leads to a disorder of unimaginable
proportions. Today the Rural System is subject to a Financial
Model that is not able "to understand" it, nor contain it. Logics
and Politics that go beyond the model of Financial Laws must be
reformulated. It is necessary to structure a Political System that
privileges an Economic Patrimony (see
http://www.ecosostenibile.org/patrimoniale.html), where every single
asset of the territory (Man above all) is reconnected and reinserted
into a system which promotes dignity at work as an element of
continuous and endless Creative Work. Without these elements the
failure of financial policies and their recipients will be
increasingly devastating for man and the environment that surrounds
him. Up until today, the failure and the application
difficulties of the 1996 Cork Conference (becoming law with the
territorial Rural Development Plans) denotes, very probably, a wrong
methodological formulation of the issue. Besides, the application of
the last RDP constitutes a contradiction in terms, especially with
regards to Article 6 (simplification of norms) of the conference
which literally declares: "Rural development policy, notably in its
agricultural component, needs to undergo radical simplification in
legislation. Whilst there should be no renationalisation of the CAP,
there must be greater coherence of what is presently done through
many separate channels, a limitation of EU law on general rules and
procedures, more subsidiarity in decisions, decentralisation of
policy implementation and more flexibility overall.." It seems
that what has been (or has not been) accomplished at a regional
level up until today goes in another direction. It appears
evident that the complexity of the rural system and its connections
to the social, alimentary, ecological and urban systems can not be
addressed through financial laws (which are often complex and
inapplicable) or through programs with doubtful general effects for
the system. This Page is an invitation to everyone to propose
ideas and suggestions for actions that we have to take with regards
to the Political, Scientific and Social culture but that we cannot
take alone. You can send ideas and suggestions to:
gubissa@tin.it; thank you for your collaboration.
Guido Bissanti
|
|
|