|
|
Rural reform
A True Application of the 1996 Cork
Declaration
We cannot assist without reacting to the Political, Scientific and
Social indifference that is shown towards the rural world.
The issue is linked to the indifference of the economic and
financial system towards a fabric that cannot have explicit
repercussions on the GDP and on the economic indexes.
Moreover the Rural System, in such, cannot be "stimulated" with
superficial financial policies. A fabric must be connected in
structural way, where Man, Territory and Economy find citizenship
and not subjection.
The Rural System involves and connects every Social and
Environmental sphere. Ignoring this by creating alternative and
unscrupulous policies leads to a disorder of unimaginable
proportions.
Today the Rural System is subject to a Financial Model that is not
able "to understand" it, nor contain it.
Logics and Politics that go beyond the model of Financial Laws must
be reformulated. It is necessary to structure a Political System
that privileges an Economic Patrimony (see http://www.ecosostenibile.org/patrimoniale.html),
where every single asset of the territory (Man above all) is
reconnected and reinserted into a system which promotes dignity at
work as an element of continuous and endless Creative Work.
Without these elements the failure of financial policies and their
recipients will be increasingly devastating for man and the
environment that surrounds him.
Up until today, the failure and the application difficulties of the
1996 Cork Conference (becoming law with the territorial Rural
Development Plans) denotes, very probably, a wrong methodological
formulation of the issue. Besides, the application of the last RDP
constitutes a contradiction in terms, especially with regards to
Article 6 (simplification of norms) of the conference which
literally declares: "Rural development policy, notably in its
agricultural component, needs to undergo radical simplification in
legislation. Whilst there should be no renationalisation of the CAP,
there must be greater coherence of what is presently done through
many separate channels, a limitation of EU law on general rules and
procedures, more subsidiarity in decisions, decentralisation of
policy implementation and more flexibility overall.."
It seems that what has been (or has not been) accomplished at a
regional level up until today goes in another direction.
It appears evident that the complexity of the rural system and its
connections to the social, alimentary, ecological and urban systems
can not be addressed through financial laws (which are often complex
and inapplicable) or through programs with doubtful general effects
for the system.
This Page is an invitation to everyone to propose ideas and
suggestions for actions that we have to take with regards to the
Political, Scientific and Social culture but that we cannot take
alone.
You can send ideas and suggestions to: gubissa@tin.it; thank you for
your collaboration.
Guido Bissanti
|
|
|