Small is Better

(Temporary Translation)

A social model is the result of a cultural model, which builds on the knowledge gained so far from civilization.
Our civilization is the result of over two thousand years of history but in the last century the presence philosophical, cultural, scientific and technical accident and more meaningful.
To tell what we might call the last few years as the first time in history, such as playing soccer or basketball or sports you like, we are entering in between the two times and the second time will be what will determine 'balance of the story couple of Humanity.
But let's order.
Because the end of the first time?
We can call this first part of the story as that of the search by the Man of Truth. This truth, however, saw the man, until before the Enlightenment within the canons of religious and philosophical tradition, then, after the advent of this era, within the canons of "reason".
In this last period (the day) but we are experiencing as the canons of "reason" have led to management of the world that has caused so many failures, not only in terms of energy and environment, but also from a purely political and management.
We are slowly realizing that this model, born and brought up under the aegis of "reason" human, did not work as we thought but if you want to see from a certain point of view, allowed us to experience the world a little 'like a child when wise by playing a toy.
At the point where we have arrived, including the disorientation that follows, the reflections that we do, and attempts to find other solutions, we can say that we have entered an intermediate time (or range) is worth just as in sport, to that stage which the team reflects on what was and what could or should be.
This interval will last until today are not easily determined, but it is certain that the same considerations and assessments that our society is doing to make us think that we are just entering the range.
The referee is whistling the end of the first half and the way of dressing there must ripen already a new thought and projection towards the second half.
But what did not work the first time?
It is clear that I am with this article by simulating the actions that will be a little 'how to do it to other members.
It is certain that we played the game of imperfect use of resources and we played badly because we had seats in a state of alignment with the ecological reasons, that is synchronous with that right to the same principles that rules the world.
But what are the principles on which rules the world? If we understand this win certainly the second time and certainly the entire game.
Here we draw immediately the title of this contribution: Small is better (or if you want: Small is Beautiful). Why Small Is Better? Because our world system is based on a democracy of form and substance that is the best to perpetuate the most.
That democracy is based on the then maximum diversity, combined with the maximum fragmentation, so that the distributions (and weights) of tasks in energy and mass are not insured by the few but by countless forms (biodiversity and ecodiversity).
This principle has been applied very badly, especially after the industrial revolution and still is, unfortunately, to this day.
If we do not apply to human systems the same features of biological systems missed the game because we will not only incompatible with these, but because we have not applied the laws of thermodynamics and the distribution and dissemination of mass and energy.
These laws teach us that only the most fragmented processes and shared responsibility will have the greatest of whole system, which does not hold up so more on large aggregations but on small as possible.
When today we want to centralize responsibility for process and energy over large aggregations and policies designed to promote what we do we go against these principles and therefore we run the machine evil world.
The end result is that everything (knowledge, society, ecosystem, resources, etc..) Is impoverished and until we changed tactics and had better not come back on the field.
If we really want to find a module we focus on winning the Small and given an opportunity to differentiate themselves by making the protagonist in the role of producing all the energy of life.
When greater emphasis on large systems, large aggregates, centralization, and the like Monopoly disintegrate the social structure and thus the energy and ecological and privileged one thing: the centralized collection of large structures at the expense of many.
The second time the game starts only and only when we have very clear to us that the tactics that we adopt will be that of absolute democracy, where the absolute wants to represent all the qualities that the Companies will have to guarantee a perfect representation of every little the construction of dignity. Before the staff and then the human.

Guido Bissanti