|
|
Temporary Translation
Environmental
Impact Assessment Procedure
Ideas,
themes and suggestions on the rules
Guide
lines
The adoption of development goals based on the concept of
sustainability has led in recent years to the adoption by the
international community of the procedures for the environmental
assessment, which is oriented towards research and the adoption of
sustainable development policies and from a compatible ecologically,
socially and economically.
The term "impact" underlines the effect that an anthropogenic or
natural generates a target on environmental or human. In general
environmental impacts must be understood as changes of individual
components or systems produced by environmental interventions of
external origin.
The need to prevent unwanted effects on the environment caused by
human activities conducted in 1969, in the United States at birth of
the Environmental Impact Assessment (Environmental Impact
Assessment) as part of national law NEPA (National Environmental
Policy Act) as a tool for management and preventive control of the
environment and environmental conflicts.
For this purpose it is necessary to indicate the scale of potential
impacts compared to a uniform scale that allows to identify
environmental problems through comparison of the various impacts.
The scale of significance used in the assessment of the expected
impacts can be distinguished in qualitative and quantitative
cardinals.
The Environmental Impact Study (SIA), is to consider the effects
that may occur in the following specific initiatives intervention
and transformation of the territory.
The procedure is not part of the system autorizzatorio but belongs
to the decision-making process, which method of election in order to
avoid implementation of works incompatible with the surrounding
environment.
The environmental impact study is organized in the frameworks:
programmatic, and environmental design and is accompanied by the
summary in non-technical language.
The framework will include a description of the project and its
relation to planning motivation force. S'individuerą consistency
with the objectives of the project describing the effects that it is
able to generate a level urban and regional development.
It is, essentially to verify the consistency of the proposed project
with the objectives of existing planning tools, through an
examination of the state of application.
Under reference design will analyze the characteristics of designed
to illustrate the technical justification for the choice and design
of the main alternatives considered. They will described with
particular reference to the choices of process under the conditions
of use of natural resources and raw materials, quantity and quality
of water and atmospheric, and the production of waste. They will
also described measures mitigative and compensatory measures to
reduce or eliminate impacts on the territory.
As for the framework environmental impact study should define the
scope territorial and environmental systems affected by the project
analyzing critical conditions, in order to identify and describe the
changes brought about by the deployment of the work.
METHODOLOGY OF INQUIRY
The procedure for drafting an environmental impact study provides a
detailed examination of environmental components and direct and
indirect impacts that the possible implementation of causing could
cause a decline or a significant disruption of the surrounding
environment and / or in a context of wide area.
The environmental components are defined by the DPCM 377/88 and
characterized the contents of the second. 5 of DPCM 27/12/1988,
namely:
- Atmosphere
Environment-water
- Soil and subsoil
- Vegetation, fauna and Ecosystems
- Landscape and Climate Physicist
- Ionizing radiation and non-ionizing and Public Health.
This process consists in gathering information about the impact of
the proposed natural and socio-economic environment, studying the
relationship benefici-danni, considered not only in terms
ecologico-ambientale but also in the economic, aimed at respect for
the optimal management of resources.
Of the rules governing the EIA procedure including the EEC Directive
85/337, the Law on February 22, 1994, n. 146, the EC Directive
96/61, the DPR on April 12, 1996, the EC Directive 97/11, L. On
March 15, 1997, n. 59, the Decree. On March 31, 1998, n. 112, the
Decree. On April 3, 2006, n. 152 (Act on the environment) for the
treatment of the study has been done-particularly in Annex C:
Contents of the environmental impact study referred to in Article 5,
to be drawn up for the purposes of the evaluation (in accordance
indications of C dpr 12 April 1996).
Based on national standards and to the Statute Autonomous Regions,
regional governments, will be identified and evaluated:
1. The possibility or otherwise of impacts on an ecosystem falling
between those sensitive or action even if the work is not localized
in one of them;
2. The possible degradation of the system and possible impacts on
environmental components;
3. The possible disruption with regard to animal and plant species
priority;
4. Possible measures mitigative impacts.
Through the SIA must be identified characteristics and existing
conditions of the area and the possible repercussions following the
completion of works:
The types of actions and deeds;
The size and scope of reference;
Complementarity with other plans and projects;
Use of natural resources;
Waste;
Pollution and environmental disturbances;
Accident risk regarding substances and technologies used;
Interference on biotic components, and abiotic environment.
In addition, the description will take account of:
Reports and its conformity with the instruments planners on the
ground;
The criteria and the reasons for the choice of projects;
The characteristics of the technological and physical;
The Constraints;
Measures minimization of impacts;
Every possible detail on biotic and abiotic components of the
territory subject to impact.
The Environmental Impact Study is conducted through the analysis and
evaluation of all data biotic and abiotic insistent on the territory
concerned by the comparison of any data arising from investigations
in the field, information officers and with the contribution of all
the studies the territory or that concern him.
The parameters for the assessment of impacts can often be complex,
controversial and, above all, when using matrices on ecological,
difficult to implement.
In some cases, after a careful analysis of industry analysis you can
also express opinions synthetic, although discretionary may allow a
proper assessment of the impacts of our work.
What follows is a kind of a table applicable to the areas with
eleven values (negative five, five and a positive value nil).
Indices
Environmental Impact Parameters
|
|
Sectors |
- 5 |
- 4 |
- 3 |
- 2 |
- 1 |
0 |
+ 1
|
+ 2 |
+ 3 |
+ 4 |
+ 5 |
|
1 |
Atmosphere |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
Water Environment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
Soil and subsoil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Vegetation, flora and fauna |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Ecosystems |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
Public Health |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
Noise and vibration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
Radiation ionizing and non ionizing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
Landscape |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend Impacts Values
|
Value |
Description |
|
- 5 |
Irreversible |
|
- 4 |
Highly negative |
|
- 3 |
negative |
|
- 2 |
Significant |
|
- 1 |
Slight |
|
0 |
Indifferent |
|
+ 1 |
Slightly Positive |
|
+ 2 |
Positive |
|
+ 3 |
More than Positive |
|
+ 4 |
Good |
|
+ 5 |
Excellent |
Explanation of terms of the legend of Values of
impacts:
Irreversible-effects on those intending Area Causing
considered irreversible thermodynamics or impossible to restore the
original condition. Eg. The killing of a forest on soil factor or
opening a quarry with a loss of the original landscape features.
Highly-All those negative impacts determining a degradation of the
characteristics of the original field with the possibility of
recovery of the same only after the removal of the causes. Eg. The
gas emission into the atmosphere of a chemical plant.
Negative influences on the sector - which results in constant change
and can be decreased but not annulled with mitigation measures as
creation of vegetations filter, sound-absorbing barriers on wetlands
or waterways where the work creates local pollution.
Significant follow-on product Interference significant but not
substantially alter the functional or for visual or entity of
distance or influence on the sector. Eg. Noise Vibration or
influencing in a settlement that is still below the threshold of
tolerance in decibels.
Mild-Action on an area not directly detectable but assessable by
instrumental analysis and indagative that are absorbed by the
industry in the long term or minor. Eg. Dumping of products on the
ground with a total degradation of the first contact with ground
water (in this case only the analysis of groundwater can deliver on
lievitą assessment).
Indifferent-Action of the sector will absolutely not
detectable in the short them in the long run or the extent of the
work or for the distance factor. Construction of an artefact from a
remote forest absolutely not influential.
Slightly positive impact on the industry - which leads to a slight
recovery functional or visual. Eg. Using filters in air emission of
liquid or gaseous products into which partially reduce pollutants.
Positive Action-on product that substantially improves tends to
change its original appearance in the long term. Eg. Elimination of
non-forest species with replacement of native species seed.
More than Positive Action-on product similar to the first but with
influence on the same scale for stronger or closeness of the field.
Good - Opera or intervention interfering in the area substantially
improving the functional, qualitative or landscape. Eg. Recovery of
natural quarry (the recovery is not absolute because the original
conditions ecosistemiche and / or morphological are lost).
Excellent-action or intervention of the sector that generates a full
and complete recovery in the long term. Eg. Elimination of previous
artefacts as in concreting of natural water systems.
Clearly, the parameters can be refined, adapted and structured in a
manner best suited to the type of, but final, this system allows
you to avoid statements on the impact of a work too often
questionable and generic.
Guido Bissanti
|
|
|