|
The vision of reality leads us to understand
that, in fact, in our world there are two functional
systems.
The social system and ecosystem.
The two systems interact through exchange of energy,
information and matter.
Such exchanges constantly change the two systems with an
accumulation in the form of assets.
This consideration, which may seem trivial and obvious, if
it contains a fundamental principle: the social system and
ecosystem are, today, the result of an accumulation of
information, energy and matter that has lasted ever since it
appeared the man (in a social ) on the ground.
This leads to a dynamic evolution of the two systems is not
yet in balance. As in a chemical equation the balance will
be achieved when information, energy and matter are
exchanged constantly in dynamic form and without any
variation.
The new cluster, which occurred with the first environmental
emergencies (and social) is today the result of an
interaction between the two systems that, through
globalization, has enabled the equation. The equation, after
a certain threshold of activation (as in chemical processes)
has begun to produce its products which in turn tend to
trigger the system to equilibrium.
To understand better the concept we can observe the
following format:
|
Reagents |
|
Product |
|
Social System + Ecosystem |
 |
New Model |
|
 |
In this equation, the social system (through
its demographic and territorial) created a destabilizing
effect upon pulse (activation energy) which, through its
products, is acting in the opposite direction by changing
and balancing the two reagents (System and Social
ecosystem).
The product acts to change the two systems (reagents) and
the two systems, through a long and relentless, they will
find a new form and a new balance in a new product.
There is in all this a moral consequential: the two reagents
must always conform to logic anymore.
While this will not be reached the system will not achieve
the balance.
Considering that the ecosystem is strongly bound to the laws
of thermodynamics, which is based on principles that govern
the exchange of information, energy and matter, it is clear
that the equation demands that the social system is uniform
(otherwise the balance is not can be reached) to the "logic"
of existence of the ecosystem.
In short, the equation leads us towards a social model that
will contain the same elements and the identity of the
ecosystem.
This is the real determinant of the question. If we are able
to "read" the essential principles upon which the most
perfect machine that exists in thermodynamics (which is
precisely the ecosystem) we will be able to speed up to
reach a stage of balance that should characterize a long
period of stability of the Social System.
This is less complex than it might seem.
The laws of the ecosystem, and even more logical, are fairly
well known.
In it, the better to use energy from available sources
(solar at all) the system has a maximum complessizzato in
the forms and substances.
Practice in creating a machine thermodynamics (because that
is the ecosystem) consists of an incredible wealth of forms
and substances (ecodiversitą and biodiversity), which shall,
through the relationships, exchanges and relations between
individual components, the maximum possible perpetuation .
The system was opposed to the ineffable laws of
thermodynamics, which referred to the magnitude of entropy
devote our universe heat death and end of life (at least one
biological).
The Ecosystem has diversified and chopped up to create an
energy that would persist for longer.
And the Social System?
Right here it appears the reason for his conflict with the
ecosystem and the laws of thermodynamics that others are not
the most perfect Treaty of Nature that the economy could
write.
The Social System, deflected by economists and economic
systems little (or not) affected by the laws of energy, it
is structured on areas differ from those ecosystem.
We very much aligned forms, and substances with a leveling
out of the logical structures totally opposed to a good
machine thermodynamics.
In a few words in all sectors of human activity we have
often created macro economic (degree factories, large
agglomerations, little different in form and in substance)
flattening the magnitude more than is produced by the Social
System: the creative spirit.
The Social System, in parallel to what happens the ecosystem
is necessary that information, energy and matter can flow
between all individuals. But when we create structures
monospecific, little differentiated and specialized the
differences between individuals decreases (when you do not
cancel) and flows to depress depress substantially the same
social system.
Thermodynamic model that leads to death faster, more energy
soaks external polluting more and being in total contact
with the other system (the Ecosystem) interferes with the
damaged and alterations.
At this point we return the equation: the mechanism that has
developed is a kind of feedback, that is, that ability to
have complex systems to correct themselves if intervening
factors that would tend to cancel the System.
We are fully in this first phase (historical) of the
equation: we're getting some feedback by the information
that is gradually working on balance.
How can any notice?
Before the'70s do not talk (except in some scientific
fields) of the Environmental Emergency, there was no
environmental awareness or culture of energy saving, no one
spoke of Biodiversity or several questions on these issues.
These are the first information that the process of
feedback, created by the, is entering the reagents
(especially in the Social System) slowly leading to a
rebalancing of the same.
How long is it harder to know: there are too many variables
and no software or computer that has a memory.
But we know that is inexorable and that does not make sense
even the opinions, because thermodynamics is not opinionable.
Guido Bissanti
|
